No 1045, District 25, Under The United Grand Lodge of New South Wales & ACT Australia [Views herein does not necessarily reflect those of LJR 1045 & UGL NSW & ACT.]

Monday, May 6, 2019

Ramadan: Understanding its history and traditions

The sighting of the new crescent moon marks the start of Ramadan, the most sacred month in Islamic culture.


EVERY YEAR, MUSLIMS around the world anticipate the sighting of the new crescent moon that signifies the official first day of Ramadan, the ninth month of the Islamic calendar and the most sacred month in Islamic culture. 
The start of Ramadan fluctuates each year because the lunar Islamic calendar follows the phases of the moon. The beginning and end of Ramadan are determined by a moon sighting committee in Saudi Arabia. The first day begins the day after the committee spots the new crescent moon, which can be tricky since it’s quite faint and can be seen for only about 20 minutes. If the moon isn’t visible to the naked eye because of haze or clouds, lunar calculations are used to predict whether it’s in the sky. This year Ramadan is predicted to begin on May 6, and to end June 3 with Eid al-Fitr celebrations.

Origin of Ramadan

Ramadan, one of the months in the Islamic calendar, was also part of ancient Arabs’ calendars. The naming of Ramadan stems from the Arabic root “ar-ramad,” which means scorching heat. Muslims believe that in 610 A.D. the angel Gabriel appeared to Prophet Muhammad and revealed to him the Quran, the Islamic holy book. That revelation, Laylat Al Qadar—or the “Night of Power”—is believed to have occurred during Ramadan. Muslims fast during that month as a way to commemorate the revelation of the Quran. (Read how muslims, although often misunderstood, are thriving in America.)
The Quran consists of 114 chapters and is taken to be the direct words of God, or Allah. The hadith, or accounts by the companions of Prophet Muhammad’s thoughts and deeds, supplement the Quran. Together they form the religious texts of Islam.


During Ramadan, Muslims aim to grow spiritually and build stronger relationships with Allah. They do this by praying and reciting the Quran, making their actions intentional and selfless, and abstaining from gossiping, lying, and fighting. 

(See how American Muslims celebrate Ramadan.)
Throughout the month Muslims fast, also refraining from drinking and sexual intercourse between sunrise and sunset. Fasting is obligatory for all Muslims, except for the ill, pregnant, traveling, elderly, or menstruating. Days missed fasting can be made up throughout the rest of the year, either all at once or one day here and there.





Muslim worshippers pray near the Dome of the Rock in Jerusalem's Al-Aqsa Mosque during Ramadan.

Meals are opportunities for Muslims to gather with others in the community and break their fast together. Pre-dawn breakfast, or suhoor, usually occurs at 4:00 a.m. before the first prayer of the day, fajr. The evening meal, iftar, can begin once the sunset prayer, Maghreb, is finished—normally around 7:30. Since the Prophet Mohammad broke his fast with dates and a glass of water, Muslims eat dates at both suhoor and iftar. A staple of the Middle East, dates are rich in nutrients, easy to digest, and provide the body with sugar after a long day of fasting.
After the last day of Ramadan, Muslims celebrate Eid al-Fitr—three days of festivities where Muslims gather to pray, eat, exchange gifts, and pay their respects to deceased relatives.

THE FIVE PILLARS OF ISLAM

These guidelines are fundamental to the lives of Muslims.
Sawm: fasting from dawn til dusk during Ramadan
Shahadah: believing there is no deity but God and prophet Mohammad (peace be upon him) as his messenger
Zakat: giving to charity
Salah: praying five times a day
Hajj: making the pilgrimage to Mecca at least once during their lifetime if able.

Sunday, May 5, 2019

History of the Two Pillars

According to tradition, Melcarthus, a Tyrian navigator and explorer, sailing in search of fabled Atlantis or dimly rumoured Britain, had paused in a bay at the western extremity of the land beyond the straits, and set up there two pillars as a memorial, building over them the temple of Hercules. A colony of Tyre was established there, and the place grew into the ancient Gades, the modern Cadiz. As the temple increased in wealth, through the votive offerings of passing voyagers, it became more splendid, and others made of precious metals replaced the first rude pillars of stone. As late as the second century this temple existed in its greatest splendour. Flavius Philostratus, who visited it, testifies to its magnificence, and in his Life of Apollonius of Tyana gives the following description of the pillars:
"The pillars in the temple were composed of gold and silver, and so nicely blended were the metals as to form but one colour. They were more than a cubit high, of a quadrangular form, like anvils, whose capitals were inscribed with characters neither Indian nor Egyptian, nor such as could be deciphered. These pillars are the chains which bind together the earth and sea. The inscriptions on them were executed by Hercules in the house of the Parcae, to prevent discord arising among the elements and that friendship being disturbed which they have for each other."
These pillars were the nucleus of the ancient Gades, and naturally became the metropolitan emblem of the modern city, as the horse's head was of Carthage.
The tradition of the Freemasons in regard to the two pillars, which are a prominent emblem of their Craft, is, that they represent the pillars Jachin and Boaz which Hiram of Tyre made for Solomon, and set one on either side of the entrance to the Temple, to commemorate the pillar of cloud by day and of fire by night which guided the Israelites in their forty years' wanderings in the wilderness. Whatever significance the Hebrews may have attached to these pillars, there is good reason for believing that they received the material emblem from the Tyrians at the time of the building of the Temple. The Scriptures give a minute account of the dimensions and designs of the pillars, (2 Kings, vii, and 2 Chronicles, iii,) but are silent as to their significance; and there is nothing in the whole Scriptural account of them to forbid the conclusion that the ideas symbolized by them were as much Tyrian as Jewish. Tyre had been a rich and prosperous city for over two hundred years, when Solomon undertook the building of the Temple. The Tyrians had been skilled in architecture and other arts to a degree that implied a high state of mental culture, while the Hebrews were yet nomadic tribes living in tents. The tabernacle was only a tent, and in this first Hebrew endeavour to give it a more enduring structure of wood and stone, Solomon naturally appealed to the greater skill of the subjects of the friendly Hiram, King of Tyre. When the Hebrews began to build the Temple, they ceased their wanderings, they became permanently established, and, as a memorial of this fact, they embodied in the architectural design of the Temple a symbol which, by the Tyrians and many other nations descended from the ancient Aryan stock, was considered emblematic of a divine leadership that had conducted them to a new and permanent home; this was the true significance of the two pillars.
As long as the Hebrew were wanderers, the pillars of cloud by day and of fire by night were merely a metaphor, to express their belief in a divine direction of their movements. When they came at last to the Promised Land, the figurative pillars of cloud and fire became the two pillars in the porch of the Temple, as the symbol of the establishment of the nation.
Having thus traced the story of the emblems back through two lines of descent to a common point in Tyre, we must take a look into the remoter past to find the origin of the symbol in the earliest recorded ideas of the human race in connection with the Deity, and from that point we may follow its descent again through the two independent routes of Greek and Scandinavian mythology.
The ancient Aryans who composed the Vedas had not then arrived at the stage of intellectual development in which they could entertain the idea of an abstract principle as the one universal law, or of any god except a risible one. To them it seemed impossible that there could be a spiritual essence without some material form. They accepted fire, the most inexplicable and striking of the agencies of nature, as this first and all-pervading force, which controlled the universe; and the sun, the grandest and most brilliant mass of fire, as the embodiment of the Deity.
Here are two verses of the Vedas, as translated by Max Muller, which may be called the Genesis of the Brahmins, and in them are two words around which have crystallized fancies growing into  myths, and myths growing into monuments of wood and stone, and again into ideal beings, until the original conceptions, have been almost lost. Yet through all these changes some characteristics of the original meaning have been so stamped upon each new form, that the thread of connection, from those ancient days when the first peoples of the human race worshiped the sun on the plains of Central Asia, down through all the ages to the comparatively modern symbol of the Pillars of Hercules, is unmistakable:
1. "In the beginning there arose the golden Child. He was one born lord of all that is. He established the earth and this sky; - Who is the God to whom we shall offer our sacrifice?
2. "He who gives life, he who gives strength, whose command all the bright gods revere, whose shadow is immortality; whose shadow is death; Who is the God to whom we shall offer our sacrifice?"
If there were nothing but the coincidence of the two words italicized in the foregoing verses, with the names of the two pillars in Solomon's Temple - Boaz meaning strength, and Jachin to establish - if there were nothing but this to establish the connection of the two pillars as well as the Pillars of Hercules and also the Greek myth of Castor and Pollux, with these ancient expressions, the identity or all these myths and symbols might be more doubtful than it is; but there is more.
In the Vedas the sun is called the "runner," the "quick racer;" he is called Arvat, the horse; Agni, the fire; Arusha, the red one, the strong one, the son of Heaven and Earth; Indra, the god of all gods. He is represented as drawn in a chariot over his daily course through the heavens by "the harits," "the rohits," and "the arushas," i.e., the gleaming, the ruddy, and the gold-colour horses of the dawn, which are the first rays of the morning sun.
The flexibility of the idea, within a certain range of expressions seems to be acknowledged by the poets of the Vedas in the following verse:
"Hear thou, the brilliant Agni, my prayer, whether the two black horses bring thy car, or the two ruddy, or the two red horses."
Notwithstanding all the interchanging of names, numbers, and genders, and the changing of forms from animal to human, and vice versa, there is an adherence to the idea of beings endowed with supernatural strength and brightness, and of a contest between, and alternating supremacy of, light and darkness!
It requires no great stretch of the imagination to conceive how, in the Greek modification of this many-sided plastic myth of the sun god, Indra should be the prototype of Jove, and Arusha of Apollo, and also of Heracles. Indeed, it seems probable that, out of the numerous names of this one object of adoration, the sun grew nearly all the wonderful and fantastic system of both Greek and Scandinavian mythology.
In the Vedic myths, the phenomena which attended the rising and setting of the sun, the clouds, same black, some ruddy, and some shining like molten gold or silver, and also his first and last beams darting through, were spoken of as horses or cattle, or beings with human forms, almost invariably in pair.
In some places the ruddy clouds that precede his rising are called the bright cows." The two horses which the sun is said to harness to his car are called the "Arusha," the red ones; in other places they are called the "two Asvins," the shining mares; and in others the idea is modified still more, and they are called the "two sisters," and, at last, we find, are named Day and Night, the "daughters of Arusha," the one gleaming with the brightness of her father, and the other decked with stars.
Professor Whitney, in his Essay on the Vedas, introduces the "two Asvins" as "enigmatical divinities," whose vocation or province in Aryan mythology he does not discover, though, at the same time he intimates the probability that they may be identical with the Dioscuri of the Greeks; and Professor Muller hints at the same identity, but with no more reference to their true character of divine forerunners or guides for families, tribes, or races of men wandering about the world in search of new homes. It is related of the Dioscuri that, when Castor for was killed, Pollux, inconsolable for his loss, besought Jove to let him give his own life for that of his brother. To this Jove so far consented as to allow the two brothers to each pass alternate days under the earth pad in the celestial abodes, their alternate daily deaths and ascensions to the heavens being only another version of the story of Day and Night, the daughters of Arusha. The twin brothers, Castor and Pollux, are represented as always clad in shining armour, and mounted on snow-white steeds, thus reproducing the chief characteristics of the "two Asvins," the shining mares of the Vedas, and showing that all these metamorphoses are only variations of the same idea.
The Hebrew metaphor of the pillar of cloud by day and of fire by night, to express the idea of a divine leadership, points to the same natural objects - clouds and fire - that to the earlier Aryans were symbols of the presence of the Deity; and the whole idea might seem a reproduction or elaboration of that expressed in the following verses of the Rig-Veda, written a thousand years before:
Wherever the mighty water-clouds went, where they placed the seed and lit the fire, thence arose He who is the sole life of the bright gods; - Who is the God to whom we shall offer our sacrifice?
"He who by His might looked even over the water clouds, the clouds which gave strength and lit the sacrifice; He who alone is God above all gods."
The fact that nearly every manifestation of the presence of the Deity recorded in Hebrew history down to the time of the building of the Temple was in a cloud shows at least a remarkable resemblance to the Aryan conceptions of the divine presence.
The further elaboration of the idea in symbolizing the presence of the Deity by two pillars of wood or stone, and particularly of such presence in the character of a leader through long wanderings to a place of permanent establishment, was not exclusive with the Hebrews. Other races with whom the
Hebrews could not have come in contact had precisely the same symbol of two pillars of wood or stone, a fact which makes it a reasonable presumption that the two pillars, one of cloud, one of fire, which were their prototypes, were not more exclusively a Hebrew idea.
In Sparta the twin Dioscuri are said to have been represented by two pillars of stone, which were sometimes joined by a smaller horizons bar to represent their twin ship. Frequently the top of one of these posts was carved in the semblance of a human head. The Spartans may have borrowed the emblem from the Tyrians; the fact that the ancient North men employed the two pillars to symbolize precisely the same ideas as those connected with them by the Hebrews and Greeks, makes it quite likely that the Spartans derived the symbol from the same original source as the Tyrians.
A column of stone was in fact a common symbol of the Deity among many ancient nations. Venus was worshiped at Paphos under the fond of a stone. Juno of the Thespians and Diana of the Icarians were worshiped under the same form. The most famous of the Syrian deities was El Gabal, (the stone,) a name to which is akin the modern Arabic gebel, a mountain, or a rock. The very name of Gibraltar, one of the mountains to which poetry has transferred the title of Pillars of Hercules, is from Gebel Tarik, the mountain, or the rock, of Tarik, one of the first Moors who set foot on the northern side of the straits, and after whom came those who established in Spain the brilliant and romantic empire of these successors of the ancient Phoenicians.
There is good ground for the presumption that Heracles of the Greeks was only another version of the myth of the Dioscuri. The Hebrews gave each of the pillars a name, though they received the emblem from the Tyrians, who employed them as the emblem of one deity; and as the Tyrians were earlier than the Greeks, this phrase of the monotheistic significance of the pillars must have come down from the same ancient source as the myth of the Dioscuri.
With both Greeks and Tyrians "Heracles," transformed by the Latin’s into "Hercules," seemed to be a transferable honorary title. The proper name of the Tyrian Heracles was Melcarthus, whose mother was said to be Asteria, the starry heavens; while the proper name of the Greek Heracles was Alcaeus, who was said to be the son of Jove by a mortal mother, Alcmena, as the Dioscuri were said to be the twin sons of Jove by a mortal mother Leda. The Heracles of the Tyriaus and the Castor and Pollux of the Greeks were the patron deities of seamen and navigators, as well as of feats of strength and agility.
Turning now to the mythology of the Scandinavians, we find in the character of Thor one which corresponds in all these particulars. He was said to he the son of Odin, the eldest of the gods by Jord, (the earth.) Not only do the stories of his feats of strength with his hammer correspond to those of Heracles with his club, but also he was the patron deity of the early Norse navigators, who were as daring as even the Phoenicians.
The "sacred columns" of the Norse mythology were two high wooden posts, or pillars, fashioned by hewing. These stood on either aide of the "high seat" of the master of the household, and hence were called "the pillars of the high seat," and were a sort of household symbol of Thor. The upper end of one of the pillars being, like the Spartan symbol, carved in the semblance of a human head, the setting up of these pillars was the sign of the establishment of the household on that spot. When a Northman moved, no matter how far, he took his sacred pillars with him; and where these were set up, there was his home until he made a formal change of domicile by moving them to some new spot.
When the North men discovered Iceland, and began to emigrate there, the sacred pillars of each Norse family were thrown overboard when the ship came near the land, and on the nearest habitable spot to where they ere cast ashore by the waves, they were set up, by planting the ends in the ground, as a symbol of possession, being in some respect a formal act of "entry," having something of the same significance as the act of the emigrant in the Western States who has "staked out a claim."
When the pillars were set up, the house was built around them, and, though the pillars and the domicile might be moved to new locations, the place where the pillars were first cast ashore always retained a peculiar significance and sacredness to the family. Thus it is related of Throd Hrappsson, that his pillars, when cast overboard, were carried away by the waves and currents and apparently lost. He settled, however, on the eastern side of Iceland, and had been living there ten or fifteen years when it was discovered that his pillars had been cast ashore on the western coast, upon which he straightway sold his estate, and moved to the locality where his pillars had been found.
Many other instances of the casting of the sacred columns into the sea, in order that they might guide North men in their selection of homes in Iceland, are related in Rudolph Keyser's Religion of the North men.
Of Erik the Red it is told, that, having loaned his posts of honour (possibly as a pledge of some promise to be fulfilled) to another Icelander, he could not get them back, which gave occasion for a long feud, into which many other families were drawn, and many of the adherents of both parties were slain.
"When the Norse chieftain Thorolf Mostrarskegg left Norway to settle in Iceland, he tore down the temple of Thor, over which he had presided, in which he seemed to have some kind of proprietary right from having built it chiefly at his own expense for the use of the worshipers of Thor, and took with him the most of the timber, together with the earth beneath the platform on which Thor's statue had been seated."
When he came in view of Iceland, the two sacred columns of the temple were thrown into the sea; and where these were cast on shore by the waves, he called the place Thorsnes, and built the temple of Thor, placing the two sacred columns, one on either side, just within the doorway.
The incidents in which the two columns thus appear in the earliest history of the Norse people are, it is true, of modern date, when compared with their appearance at the building of Solomon's Temple, of the erection of the Pillars of Hercules by Melcarthus, near the straits of Gibraltar; but their later appearance in history as the "Pillars of Thor" does not argue that they were copied from the Pillars of Hercules, but only that written history, or even chronology of any kind, was not known in Scandinavia until a much later period than in Syria and Greece. The Germanic race, however, of which the North men were a branch, had its origin in the centre of Asia near the Caspian Sea. From
there they had brought the same tradition as the Syrians and Greeks; and the religious myths, out of which the Greeks afterwards elaborated their fanciful system of mythology, were by the North men, whose rude climate gave imagination a gloomier turn, fashioned into the more barbarous, rotesque, and sanguinary "Asa faith." The cosmogony of the Greeks and the North men corresponds so nearly as to leave no doubt of a common origin, and yet the details were so different as to show that for ages the ancient stories must have been handed down from one generation to another by people possessed of a vastly different degree of refinement, and surrounded by a different aspect of nature.
The Asa faith was as ancient as the cosmogony of the Phoenicians and the Greeks, and the sacred columns of Thor were not an idea borrowed from the Pillars of Heracles, but an independent perpetuation of the same mystic symbol.
The facts that the two pillars were a sacred symbol in three ancient and contemporaneous religions, and that they occupied the same position and significance in the temples of Thor of the Scandinavians, Heracles of the Tyrians, and Jehovah of the Hebrews, help to confirm the theory of a common mythology as the foundation and the source of the ideas of all the later faiths. The fervid spirit of the Hebrews gave to their version of this and other ancient conceptions a diviner mould. As the solar ray of light, split up by the prism, yields three groups of rays, one of which carries with it the main portion of the heat, another the greater part of all the light, and another nearly all the actinic qualities, and each of these groups embracing two or more of the seven prismatic colours, so the rays of that ancient Aryan sun, the first and most natural emblem of the Deity, falling on the human mind, have been elaborated to a great variety of faiths, each carrying with it some of the divine light, but in other characteristics as different as the groups in the spectrum of the analysed solar ray. With one race the predominant traits of religious thought are brilliant, but merely sentimental coruscations of poetic fancy; with another, cold, practical maxims of thrift; with another, the fervid, but sombre, enthusiasm, the zealous dogmatism that overturns empires.
But in all there is the acknowledgment that the regular alternation of day and night is the work of God, the phenomena indicating his presence to guide man around the habitable portion of the world.
"Sun and moon go in regular succession, that we may see Indra and believe," writes one of the poets of the Rig-Veda.
"The day is thine, the night also is thine: thou hast prepared the light and the sun," sings the poet of Israel.


Wednesday, April 3, 2019

A Mason’s Craft

       The Medieval Mason was not a monk but a highly skilled lay craftsman who combined the roles of architect, builder, craftsman, designer and engineer. Using only a set of compasses, a set square and a staff or rope marked off in halves, thirds and fifths, the mason was able to construct some of the most amazing structures ever built: Gothic cathedrals. Their awesome size combined with their appearance of lightness and fragility has led people to believe that medieval masons had some magical secret but this was actually just an understanding of proportion and basic geometry.



       Ely Cathedral © Contemporary illustrations of master masons show them to have been prosperous middle class professionals. The men they supervised, who did much of the actual carving and laying of stone, were like modern skilled tradesmen, and many younger men still learning the trade worked on the building sites as labourers.

       Masons shared their secrets openly and many medieval buildings imitate each other in style and technique. The choir at Lincoln Cathedral, for instance, is similar to that at Ely, and both copy Westminster Abbey. Designs for the building were worked out at full scale on tracing floors covered in soft plaster. Such floors survive at Wells Cathedral and at York Minster. Sometimes drawings on parchment were also made and at Worcester a carving shows a mason giving a drawing to a monk.

       All the stones were carved on the ground before they were set in place. Larger blocks were carved at quarries which made them lighter and easier to transport. Individual masons used special symbols [mason's mark] to ensure that they were paid for the blocks they carved.

       Building a great cathedral was hard work and often dangerous. At Canterbury Cathedral in 1178 the Master Mason, William of Sens was inspecting the high vaults when he fell from the scaffolding and was paralysed. Most of the actual construction was done during the spring and summer months, allowing the mortar to set and the laid stones to settle over the winter. Breaking during the winter also gave the Masons a chance to carve more stones for the following summer.

       Heavy stones were brought to the site by water or cart. The masons of Laon Cathedral in France, grateful to the oxen that pulled their carts, carved oxen peeking out of the top of the towers. Scaffolding was used to reach higher parts of the building, and 'put-log' holes for this are still visible on many cathedrals and castles. Cranes and pulleys also helped lift materials. Arches were supported using wooden frames called 'centring' which held the stones steady before the keystone at the top locked the whole thing into place.

       Misericords, Wells Cathedral © Gothic cathedrals were usually supported on deep foundations and had thick walls to make them strong. Sometimes structural problems did appear, especially in the area of the crossing where the tall central tower was supported on relatively small piers, or pillars. At Salisbury Cathedral the 13th century tower was made too large, forcing its hasty reinforcement, whilst at Wells Cathedral, owl-eyed strainer arches had to be inserted to strengthen the crossing. Reinforcement did not always work, however, and at Ely, the Norman crossing tower collapsed in 1322 and destroyed part of the choir. When the tower was rebuilt, light timber was used instead of heavy stone to create the large octagonal lantern we see today. Amazingly, such extreme measures were rarely needed.

        Many of the apparently frivolous details on a Gothic cathedral have a structural purpose. Decorative details actually helped to strengthen weak points. The ornate pointed pinnacles at the corners of the building, for instance, add weight which helps to keep the corner strong, in the same way that pressing down on a pile of books will prevent them from toppling over.

       Arched flying buttresses make the cathedral look like a wedding cake but also keep the walls from falling outwards. Naturalistic foliage was a popular decorative detail in the Gothic period, and small animals, birds and people frolic amongst the leaves and flowers. Sometimes the foliage grew into something else: the leaves at Wells Cathedral grow into the head of a man with toothache. English Masons specialised in carving heads, which they often positioned so that the head supported something heavy, although the expression on the face rarely seems pleased about this.

       Grotesque, semi-human figures like the Lincoln Imp were also very popular and appear not only in the stone carvings but also in wood and around the margins of manuscripts. Such images were requested by the monks and bishops who paid the masons to represent the many temptations of the world, albeit in a charming and humorous way.

       Other popular images had their origins in a more pagan past. The best known is the Green Man, a Celtic fertility god wreathed in leaves who was adopted by the church as a symbol of life, death and rebirth.

       However, most of the carvings depict more traditional religious images such as saints and miracles as related in the Bible. Some of these figures are easy to see, but others are so small and so high up that it is hard to imagine how anyone except the man who made them could ever have noticed them.

       Perhaps that was the point. Medieval people thought that the cathedral was an earthly representation of the heavenly Jerusalem, and every part of it had to be perfect, even the parts that only God could see.

About the author. Carol Davidson Cragoe is Assistant Architectural Editor of the Victoria County History. 

Sunday, March 24, 2019

The Golden Fleece



 

(Extract from GOLD, ALCHEMY AND FREEMASONRY

by Michael J Noakes, P.M. Lodge Kensington No. 270)


From the earliest moment in our Masonic career when, as a newly initiated Entered Apprentice Freemason, we are invested with our first apron, we are told that it is the distinguishing badge of a Mason and that it is “…..more ancient than the Golden Fleece or Roman Eagle…..”. What on Earth has this got to do with Freemasonry we might ask?

Golden Fleece


Assuming that the Golden Fleece we are referring to in our EAF ritual is one and the same as that stolen by Jason and the Argonauts from Colchis on the Black Sea we can refer to one of the oldest books on mining published in 1556 by the alchemist Georgius Agricola[i], “De Re Metallica” translated from Latin by Herbert Clark Hoover and Lou Henry Hoover (yes that is the same Herbert Hoover who discovered The Sons of Gwalia (Wales) Gold Mine in Western Australia and who later became the President of the United States).

Agricola says: “The Colchians placed the skins of animals in the pools of springs and since many particles of gold had clung to them when they were removed, the poets invented the “Golden Fleece” of the Colchians.” (see Figure 1).

Dating the adventures of Jason and his Argonauts can be traced to around the 5th century BC so we must assume that the reference to our EAF apron dates to before this since it is “more ancient” than the Golden Fleece or Roman Eagle. Colchis, the traditional land of the Golden Fleece, lies between the Caucasus on the north, Armenia on the south and the Black sea on the west.

Of course the objective of Jason’s raiding party was not a single Golden Fleece but rather the entire production of the “Colchis Mining Co Ltd’s” operations and its theft would have fetched a tidy sum back home. Hardly an honorable association for our EAF apron but, then again, I am not sure quite how honorable the Roman Eagle is either.

 

Metallurgy of the Golden Fleece


The method of gold recovery using the Golden Fleece closely resembles the modern method of gold recovery generally referred to as gravity gold concentration. The gold bearing rock or river gravel is pulverised to a size similar to beach sand and mixed with water to form a “mineral slurry.” If the slurry is passed over say a sheep’s fleece or in today’s world a ribbed corduroy cloth, the heavier gold particles sink into the wool of the sheep’s skin (or corduroy ribs) while the lighter waste particles pass over the top and are thrown away as “tailings”. Periodically the cloths or skins are washed to recover a “gold concentrate”. In the days of the “Colchis Mining Co Ltd” the fleeces would probably have been burned to remove the gold into a gold product.

Until recently “Corduroy Tables” were being used extensively for gold recovery in for example South Africa and South America and may well still be in use today. I personally witnessed the operation of these tables in South Africa in the 1960’s and the Philippines in the 1990’s.

The Order of the Golden Fleece

There is another reference[ii] to the source of the Golden Fleece. The “Order of the Golden Fleece” was modelled on the English Order of the Garter (which is also mentioned in our EAF ritual), dedicated to Saint Andrew and founded in 1430 by Duke Philip III of Burgundy. It was intended as a knightly brotherhood and a friendly alliance of noblemen.

Membership was originally intended to be limited to 31 although various subsequent Dukes of Burgundy increased that number to 51 and eventually to 70. Requirements included that the nominees be noblemen "in name and arms" and 'truly devoted' to the sovereign of the Order, the respective bearer of the title Duke of Burgundy. (It is noted without comment that The Knights Templars[iii] were an offshoot of a little understood monastic brotherhood, the Cistercians, who themselves danced to the tune of an extremely powerful group of noblemen living in Burgundy and Flanders).

The principal aims of the Order were to promote the glory of God and to defend the Christian faith. The order was explicitly denied to "heretics", and so became an exclusively Catholic award during the Reformation, though the choice of the pagan Golden Fleece of Colchis as the symbol of a Christian order caused some controversy.

Conclusion

So what has the Golden Fleece go to do with Freemasonry? In my view it is telling the newly initiated EAF that Masonry is based on very ancient legend that will later lead him via the transmutation of rough rock into gold through to (hermetic) alchemy as an allegory for the transmutation of darkness into light.



[i]               De Re Metalica” by Georgius Agricola, Translated from the First Latin Addition of 1556 by Herbert Clark Hoover and Lou Henry Hoover, Dover Publications, Inc., New York, 1950.
[iii]             www.templarhistory.com/revealed.html

Wednesday, March 20, 2019

The Real Object of Masonic Education



April 16, 2018 By NORM MCEVOY  http://theeducator.ca

Adapted by V.W. Bro, Norman McEvoy from a paper presented by Bro. Reynold E. Blight Executive Director, Committee on Masonic Education, California
From New Jersey Editor “Masonic Mason” Published by The Masonic Service Association of USA Vol. II January 1927. No. 7

 Masonic education is the most talked of subject in Masonry. There is scarcely a Grand Jurisdiction in which it is not a moot topic. Nearly every Masonic periodical carries articles concerning it – some in favour of the innovation and others in utter condemnation. The very vehemence with which the subject is being discussed is proof that it is pertinent and important.

  Critics are quite outspoken, one writer going so far as to declare unequivocally:

The elaborate and expensive mechanism devised by Grand Lodges for the furtherance of Masonic education is largely wasted effort.”

 Another writer in a western magazine asserts: “The plain truth is that the average Mason does not want so-called Masonic education, and I believe, does not need it.”

 The whole trouble seems to lies in the lack of a clear understanding of what Masonic education really is; what is its purpose, and what are its objectives and ideals, what is its spirit?

 The intent of this article is to present a definition of Masonic education as one worker sees it, that others may elaborate, improve, and, clarify it, if it is fundamentally correct.

  In order that the air may be cleared of misconceptions, let us state what it is not.

 Masonic education is not repeating exhortations to morality. A writer already referred to says:

Your average Mason is sick to death of being preached at.”

 The good brother is correct.

 Solemn admonitions to be good and kind, generous and forgiving, honest and truthful, while valuable in their place, do not constitute Masonic education. Those sombre reminders of our duties grow wearisome when repeated again & again. These reiterations of copybook maxims leave us cold. Commonplace and monotonous, they irk us with their drabness.

Masonic education does not provide opportunity for boring oratory. Too frequently the Master feels he has done his duty to his lodge when he has arranged for an address by a popular speaker.

 Often the speaker is an earnest brother, with a glib tongue and a reputation – a spinner o phrases and a dealer in glittering generalities; his speech is well described by Hamlet’s sad plaint: “Words, words, words!” The brethren may be entertained by the verbal presentations, and be much impressed with the orator’s command of the English tongue, but the addition to their Masonic knowledge is nil. The average orator is long on language and minus accurate information. In time the brethren see through the camouflage and realize that behind the verbal fireworks there is a painful paucity of ideas.

 Fifteen minutes of simple talk by a brother, who in clear language gives the result of careful research, is worth a dozen orations in which verbosity and flowery rhetoric disguise poverty of thought.

 Masonic education does not necessarily consist in explorations into the realms of the mystical and the occult. That there is an esoteric (hidden) meaning to Freemasonry no intelligent Mason will deny, and that this field of research offers rich promise is also apparent.

 Enshrined in Masonic ritual is a profound teaching that lures the student who is drawn toward philosophical speculation, but such studies are necessarily restricted to brethren who by training and inclination are qualified to carry on such inquiry for sharing with the brethren and giving them the task and privilege of searching out these deeper truths and interpreting them for the benefit of their fellows, in a “language understood of the people.”

 It is a mistake to assume that the generality of the Fraternity will be interested in this particular branch of Masonic research, or that they are remiss in their masonic duty if they take no interest in it.

 They simply will have none of it. And as a matter of fact, they believe that the general subject of Masonic Education is only incidentally related to esotericism.

  At the same time it is proper to say that it is a mistake on the part of brethren who ridicule and decry esoteric Masonry, and pour contempt upon the work of such men as Ward, Waite, Oliver (to name only English writers), and others, who have revealed to us some of the rich treasures of the masonic world.

  For those who are able to appreciate their work they have rendered a splendid service.

  Masonic Education is not a bombastic glorification of the Fraternity. While it is eminently proper that the brethren should be informed concerning the greatness and glory of the Craft, its ancient and honourable history, its notable achievements, and the splendid names that add luster to its story, yet modesty and restraint are more in keeping with its character than ostentation and self-praise.

 Care must be taken to protect the order from the “go-getters” spirit of that time that with student ballyhoo would play up the Craft like a circus or a political campaign. There is no need to “sell” masonry, either to our members or to the world at large. Freemasonry is not a breakfast food or a quack medicine that is need sensational slogans or screaming type to impress its virtues or its teachings upon its votaries.

 Freemasonry is a temple to be entered reverently, a worship to be rendered sincerely, a philosophy to be taught with simplicity and dignity.

 We may go further and startle good brethren by declaring that Masonic education is not merely a study of history. Joseph E. Morcombe, the well-known Masonic editor tells us:

The essential facts of Masonic history – a narrow and comparatively barren field – with the symbolism and jurisprudence of the Craft, require no great effort to cover or understand. The requisite knowledge, except for the special student, can be gathered into small compass, and is to be easily retained in memory.”

 The purpose of masonic education is to make Masonry such a vivid, vital force in the life of the individual Mason that it becomes an integral part of his very being.

 To learn how this may be accomplished it is necessary to ask and answer two questions –

 What is Freemasonry and what is education?

 The best definition of Freemasonry I know is that formulated by Dr. Joseph Fort Newton. He said: “Masonry is a philosophy of life the depth, breadth, sanity and nobility of which is not matched elsewhere; and not only a philosophy but a way of living, a method of building character, found nowhere else.” 

 The method by which character is developed is powerfully expressed by Albert Pike:

“Freemasonry is the subjugation of the human that is in man by the divine; the conquest of the appetites and passions; a continual effort, struggle and warfare of the spiritual against the material and sensual. That victory, when it has been achieved and secured, and the conqueror may rest upon his shield and wear the well-earned laurels, is the true Holy Empire.”  [Morals and Dogma, p 854]
 And the climax of the definition is reached in the avowal of Dr. Newton: “Here lies the great secret of Masonry – that it makes the man aware of the divinity within him.” [The Builder, p 293]

 This, then, is the sublime purpose of Masonic education – the revelation of the divinity in each man, the flooding of the soul with light, the release of those spiritual powers that enable a man to triumph over temptation, sin and folly; the evolution of character, and the development of those qualities of the soul that flower naturally into generosity, righteousness and moral force. 

 The noble objective of Masonic education lies close to the purpose of education as defined by the greatest educators. Says Herbart: “The main business of education is the ethical revelation of the universe.”

 Ruskin catches the same thought: “Education is leading human souls to the best by making the best out of them.”

 This conception of Masonic education greatly complicates the whole subject. It is no longer possible formally to outline courses of study covering certain topics, the formulation of precise questions to which there may be submitted precise answers. The discussions that are raised many not be settled by appeals to alleged authorities. The results of Masonic study cannot be tested by sets of examination questions such as might be submitted in geography or chemistry.

 There is nothing formal or mechanical about it. The distinction is clearly set forth by Dr. E. C. Moore, the noted educator when he says:

 “Mechanical education is easy, but it accomplished only that which should not be accomplished. Real education is hard, for it is a spiritual ministration. The temptation of substitute mere physical manipulation of living interest, spiritual insight, and comprehension ripening into action is the sin which besets us.”

 We commend to the interested Mason the ritual, the symbolism, the history and the philosophy of the Order. He studies the ritual that he may discover the clew, the Ariadne thread that leads unerringly through the labyrinth of human ignorance, delusion and passion.

 He scrutinizes the symbols, knowing, as Albert Pike said, that, “symbolism is the soul of Masonry”; the glowing figures, tropes and allegories that hide yet ever reveal the subtle truths by which men live.

 The secret of Freemasonry is disclosed to the ardent and persevering student, the seeker after truth, and he who possesses that secret, attains immortality.

 He explores the misty origins of our Masonic ceremonial, not for vain purpose of proving the venerable antiquity of the Craft, but that he may feel the heart-throb of aspiring humanity, from the slopes of the Himalayas and the valley of the Nile to the teeming thoroughfares of a modern city.
Humanity is one! Human brotherhood is not a rosewater sentiment, it is a palpitating fact compounded of sympathy, understanding, a sense of a common weakness and strength and an all-embracing love.

 So we might go on and read a true significance into every subject generally classified under Masonic education.

Could there be a better summing up of the purpose, the objectives, the spirit of Masonic education?  

 All to the end that a man cast off the rags of triviality, flippancy and self-indulgence, and clothed in the royal raiment of virtue, manliness and self-respect, know himself as a son of the Most High, living a life of conquest and service in a world that is the dwelling place of Deity.

Sunday, November 13, 2016

Lodge Officers Nov 2016-2017



Worshipful Master........................................................... WBro Juan Paolo 'Pao' Beringuel
Immediate Past Master.....................................................WBro Micvi 'Mick' Fidel
Senior Warden..................................................................Bro Roderick 'Eric" Buenavista
Junior Warden..................................................................Bro Roberto 'Obet' Urqueza
Chaplain...........................................................................WBro Antonio 'Tony' Saputil
Treasurer...........................................................................WBro Manuel 'Manny' Santos
Secretary...........................................................................WBro Mario 'Mar' Baylon Jnr
Director of Ceremonies....................................................RWBro Emmanuel 'Manny' Maniago, PAGM
Senior Deacon..................................................................Bro Troy Quimpo
Junior Deacon...................................................................Bro Daniel Vincent Placido
Director of Music.............................................................WBro Manuel 'Manny' Placido
Organist............................................................................WBro Herminigildo 'Hermie' Mateo
Membership Officer.........................................................RWBro Emmanuel 'Manny' Maniago, PAGM
Membership Officer.........................................................VWBro Remegio 'Romy' Nieto, PDGDC
masoniCare Caring Officer..............................................RWBro Rey Porras, PSGW
masoniCare Caring Officer..............................................VWBro Rodolfo 'Rudy' Romerosa, PGDC
masoniCare Caring Officer..............................................RWBro Fidencio 'Fidel' Pamplona, PSGW
Inner Guard......................................................................Bro Oscar 'Ohka' Eugenio
Steward............................................................................Bro Crezalde 'Zaldy' Pagala
Steward............................................................................Bro Roberto 'Obet' Castor
Steward............................................................................Bro Josalem 'Joji' De Guzman
Steward............................................................................Bro Jolardo De Guzman
Steward............................................................................Bro Joselito 'Jolit' De Guzman
Steward............................................................................Bro Timothy 'Tim' Glanville
Tyler.................................................................................Bro James 'Jim' Holdsworth, DSA

Lodge Mentor/ Education Officer...................................RWBro Brian Potter, PSGW
Newsletter Publisher.......................................................RWBro Bruce Quirk, PAGM
Assistant Director of Ceremonies...................................RWBro Rey Porras, PSGW
Assistant Treasurer.........................................................RWBro Fidencio 'Fidel' Pamplona, PSGW
Assistant Secretary.........................................................WBro Kristianne 'Khris' Albano, SGD

Lodge Officers Nov 2016-2017



Worshipful Master....................................... WBro Juan Paolo 'Pao' Beringuel
Immediate Past Master.................................WBro Micvi 'Mick' Fidel
Senior Warden..............................................Bro Roderick 'Eric" Buenavista
Junior Warden...............................................Bro Roberto 'Obet' Urqueza
Chaplain.......................................................WBro Antonio 'Tony' Saputil
Treasurer.......................................................WBro Manuel 'Manny' Santos
Secretary.......................................................WBro Mario 'Mar' Baylon Jnr
Director of Ceremonies................................RWBro Emmanuel 'Manny' Maniago, PAGM
Senior Deacon..............................................Bro Troy Quimpo
Junior Deacon..............................................Bro Daniel Vincent Placido
Director of Music.........................................WBro Manuel 'Manny' Placido
Organist........................................................WBro Herminigildo 'Hermie' Mateo
Membership Officer.....................................RWBro Emmanuel 'Manny' Maniago, PAGM
Membership Officer.....................................VWBro Remegio 'Romy' Nieto, PDGDC
masoniCare Caring Officer...........................RWBro Rey Porras, PSGW
masoniCare Caring Officer...........................VWBro Rodolfo 'Rudy' Romerosa, PGDC
masoniCare Caring Officer...........................RWBro Fidencio 'Fidel' Pamplona, PSGW
Inner Guard...................................................Bro Oscar 'Ohka' Eugenio
Steward.........................................................Bro Crezalde 'Zaldy' Pagala
Steward.........................................................Bro Roberto 'Obet' Castor
Steward.........................................................Bro Josalem 'Joji' De Guzman
Steward.........................................................Bro Jolardo De Guzman
Steward.........................................................Bro Joselito 'Jolit' De Guzman
Steward.........................................................Bro Timothy 'Tim' Glanville
Tyler..............................................................Bro James 'Jim' Holdsworth, DSA

Lodge Mentor/ Education Officer.................RWBro Brian Potter, PSGW
Newsletter Publisher.....................................RWBro Bruce Quirk, PAGM
Assistant Director of Ceremonies.................RWBro Rey Porras, PSGW
Assistant Treasurer........................................RWBro Fidencio 'Fidel' Pamplona, PSGW
Assistant Secretary........................................WBro Kristianne 'Khris' Albano, SGD

Followers